06-07-2019, 00:11 | #3021 | |
Bugcatcher
Регистрация: Nov 2008
Адрес: Russia Kursk City
Сообщений: 1,019
|
Цитата:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YRl3...ature=youtu.be
__________________
Only the dead have seen the end of the war. |
|
06-07-2019, 21:20 | #3022 |
Aircraftsman
Регистрация: Jan 2016
Сообщений: 9
|
Hi, will Indian Kilo/Sindhughosh submarines be added as playable submarines?
|
09-07-2019, 11:47 | #3023 | |
Corporal
Регистрация: Feb 2019
Сообщений: 75
|
Цитата:
|
|
21-07-2019, 11:45 | #3024 | |
Aircraftsman
Регистрация: Nov 2015
Сообщений: 10
|
Цитата:
Such a great Cold War warrior (and beautiful looking boat!) - it could use all the Kilo interfaces! - and it would make for some great missions! Just an idea Stew Последний раз редактировалось Stewy; 26-07-2019 в 12:44. |
|
26-08-2019, 01:50 | #3025 |
Corporal
Регистрация: Feb 2016
Сообщений: 83
|
I discovered another issue with American Aegis and SM-2's. The new issue is about SM-2's intercept altitude and climb rate. This problem is especially acute against high flying supersonic anti-ship missile such as SS-N-19 shipwreck. Due to the primitive missile logic design in Dangerous Waters, AA missiles would only destroy a target when they are co-altitude with the target. This is what I observe:
1. Shipwreck's profile: vertical launch up to about 10k+ then level off. When closing to about less than 10 nmi, it would gradually descent and dump tons of CM's. 2. SM-2's intercept profile against shipwreck: horizontal launch(even though VLS is supposed to be vertical launch), and gradually climb to 5-7k ft. At the last moment of interception, it would do a high angle pitch-up to catch shipwreck at higher altitude. 3. Russian SAM's fare far better because the initial vertical launch put them at much higher altitude and they are 2-3 times faster than SM-2. This can put them into co-altitude with target much quicker thus having much higher chance of success. This problem is especially obvious at long range intercepts. At long range, SM-2's success rate against SS-N-19 (before the counter-measure phase) is below 15%. Russian's SA-N-6 grumbly's chance about 40%. I have created 2 identical scenario (one with a US task group and the other with a Russian ships). The Russian group even has one less escort warship. The difference is so obvious. If you want to test it out, I can somehow upload the scenarios. If you compare the success rate of sm-2 between vanilla 1.04 and RA1.48, I believe the key that makes them so different is the altitude gained from initial vertical launch. In 1.04, all US VLS ships can do vertical launch but in RA, US ships cannot do vertical launch any more. |
26-08-2019, 15:24 | #3026 |
Leading Aircraftsman
Регистрация: Aug 2019
Сообщений: 27
|
MILAS Anti Submarine Missile
Доброго дня!
Спасибо за вашу работу. Просьба исправить дальность применения ракеты MILAS на фрегате Carlo Bergamini. По данным MBDA дальность применения ракеты системы MILAS от 5 до 35км. В данном моде ракету можно применять на дальности до 10 км, далее из-за низкого профиля полета она становится зенитной (перенацеливается и сбивает вертолеты). Количество ракет - 12 (не 4, как сейчас в RA 1.48). (Up to 12 MILAS missiles installed on twin fixed launchers). Поправка: Margottini-class (FREMM ASW) располагает двумя сдвоенными установками MILAS (4 ракеты) и двумя сдвоенными установками Teseo Mk2/A (4 ракеты), т.е. в моде по количеству ракет MILAS все верно, не хватает четырех ракет корабль\поверхность. _____________ Hello a thanks for your work! Please modify the MILAS missile on FREMM Frigate Carlo Bergamini. According to MDDA datasheet, the MILAS missile is capable of ranges from 5 to in excess of 35 km in all directions but in RA 1.48 mod the missile in antisub configuration can be launched to maximum 10 km, then it to apply a SAM configuration and hit to HELI. Numbers of MILAS missile is 12 (in RA 1.48 mod only 4). Edit: Margottini-class frigate (FREMM ASW) has Teseo Mk2/A (2 double launchers) and Milas (2 double launchers) i.e. 4 ASW Missiles and 4 Ship\Land attack missiles. Последний раз редактировалось GL-ER; 26-08-2019 в 19:05. |
26-08-2019, 22:03 | #3027 |
Sergeant
Регистрация: Jul 2016
Сообщений: 235
|
MILAS ASW mode range is 35 km.
It means point E in milas plan maximum range is 35000 (Bergamini uses meters) Video from test: https://youtu.be/cnm46oHvQMc |
26-08-2019, 22:14 | #3028 |
Leading Aircraftsman
Регистрация: Aug 2019
Сообщений: 27
|
|
26-08-2019, 22:28 | #3029 |
Sergeant
Регистрация: Jul 2016
Сообщений: 235
|
|
26-08-2019, 22:59 | #3030 |
Leading Aircraftsman
Регистрация: Aug 2019
Сообщений: 27
|
And finish step - increase the distance to 15-17km (and Heli near "E").
If you will have all correct in this case I shut up and keep a silence. And one thing that I did - for target point I use the manual target marker (Ctrl-Enter, for example 1003 and apply this to MILAS plan and push "Auto preset" button). Please try it. I lost one missile on 15 km distance (use Heli and manual target marker). In attacment the save from my last mission where I shot down the Heli by Milas missile (it was at a distance "F" 22km, "E" 24km). Последний раз редактировалось GL-ER; 26-08-2019 в 23:32. |
26-08-2019, 23:41 | #3031 | |
Sergeant
Регистрация: Jul 2016
Сообщений: 235
|
No, i havent time for launching MILAS to every situation and every kilometer of range. You probably have something wrong with installation - please check this.
RA needs clear version 1.04 + RA 1.48 + patch 3 Maybe you forgot about one step? Цитата:
I cannot open your save because you use different resolution - not available to my monitor. Please send me replay.dat from your last mission. But i think you have installation error |
|
27-08-2019, 00:04 | #3032 | ||
Leading Aircraftsman
Регистрация: Aug 2019
Сообщений: 27
|
Yes, I have this sequence of game installation (+Russian Voices).
Цитата:
I've used a manual target marker, TMA calculated marker and even truth marker. If I use it on more than 10 km distance I lost the missile or Heli. Цитата:
Последний раз редактировалось GL-ER; 27-08-2019 в 11:39. |
||
27-08-2019, 01:30 | #3033 | |
Sergeant
Регистрация: Jul 2016
Сообщений: 235
|
Did you read RA_Weapon_Info_rev39.pdf (in "manual" folder)?
MILAS uses the same doctrine as SILEX: Цитата:
Milas in ASW mode transit at 200 meters (after decreasing altitude from launch) Milas in ASuW mode transit at 10 meters (after decreasing altitude from launch) So its easy to check MILAS mode after chacking missile altitude. Your replay will not show that so i didn't watch it |
|
27-08-2019, 04:00 | #3034 | |
Leading Aircraftsman
Регистрация: Aug 2019
Сообщений: 27
|
Цитата:
OK, my mistake is incorrect "F" position of MILAS waypoint. The sensors of MILAS missile detect Heli as a surface vessel (The missile altitude lower 17m i.e. it's in ASuW mode). Последний раз редактировалось GL-ER; 28-08-2019 в 15:08. |
|
28-08-2019, 05:27 | #3035 |
Corporal
Регистрация: Feb 2016
Сообщений: 83
|
1. Subcommand missions are now password protected. I am trying to modify some of the missions for my own uses. Would it be possible to get the password to unlock them?
2. How do I make controllable platform selectable? I put two controllable subs in but the selection drop-down menu is still greyed out. |
23-09-2019, 14:18 | #3036 |
Leading Aircraftsman
Регистрация: Jan 2015
Сообщений: 26
|
Very nice work with the new Fire Control Interfaces for the Victor and Sierra.
However I discovered an problem with Victor III. When launching torpedo below 240 meters torpedo will always malfunction and sink to bottom and grey out. |
23-09-2019, 21:05 | #3037 |
Северный флот
Регистрация: Apr 2007
Адрес: Murmansk
Сообщений: 230
|
|
24-09-2019, 01:59 | #3038 | |
Bugcatcher
Регистрация: Nov 2008
Адрес: Russia Kursk City
Сообщений: 1,019
|
Цитата:
If the launch depth should be above 250 meters - then this should be fixed on all victors of the series.
__________________
Only the dead have seen the end of the war. |
|
24-09-2019, 02:54 | #3039 | |
Северный флот
Регистрация: Apr 2007
Адрес: Murmansk
Сообщений: 230
|
Цитата:
Is there a similar limitation for Western subs? Or should there be a limit to the speed at which they can fire a torpedo? |
|
24-09-2019, 10:17 | #3040 |
Bugcatcher
Регистрация: Nov 2008
Адрес: Russia Kursk City
Сообщений: 1,019
|
The peculiarity of torpedo tubes located side on-board (688 ssn21 etc) is that they do not allow shooting at speeds close to maximum. But the speed limit is not exactly known. It is possible to make a speed limit for subs with a side arrangement of torpedo tubes. But I repeat - the limit speed, is not exactly known.
__________________
Only the dead have seen the end of the war. |
Здесь присутствуют: 18 (пользователей: 0 , гостей: 18) | |
|
|