Цитата:
Сообщение от dyshman
cayman, why you have choose Xia SSBN to make it playable? why not Han SSN or Shang-093? this platform is dead during on-line and off-line games. no one wants to "die" within 5 minutes term. or not?  |
It depends. It would be pretty sad if the only playable subs in RA were the most modern ones. The Xia has its place, and you can design missions in the southeast asia where for instance Australians and Japanese go against the Cinese. Why do we have to put the Russians and Americans in everywhere ?
Just some time ago, the french designed a very interesting multiplayer mission were the blue side mostly composed of seawolfs, 688 and perry frigates (they were using lwami) went against a cinese force, surface and subsurface. The endgame was to deny 3 cinese SSBN entry to the south cinese sea. Imagine if instead of the americans they had used collins and harushios, and the opfor kilos and xia ?
It would have made for an exciting mission.
I think its nice to have units that span several decades. It gives mission designers more creative freedom. I mean if people play on Kilos why not on Xias ?